Why Gawker is Writing Better Headlines Than the Rest of the Web

by Andrew Hanelly on April 3, 2012

It’s almost impossible not to click on a link to a Gawker article.

It doesn’t matter if you see one on Twitter, your RSS reader or scrawled in Sharpie on the interior of a bathroom stall, it’s a moth-to-fire, trancelike pull.

You could say it’s because they have the best content on the web (but 98% of #wjchat would probably disagree), or you could give credit where I think it’s due: to the headline.

The headline is arguably the most important factor in visibility for your content online. And Gawker writes some of the most visible ones. Here’s why*: 

1. They are as provocative as possible without being entirely NSFW.

Gawker headlines grab the heart of the matter from a story and squeeze it in their hands. They answer the “why should I care about this” before you even finish the sentence. They are aggressive, direct and descriptive. Because they:

2. Put context right in the headline, but not enough that you don’t have to click.

They give you a reason to click, pique your interest, and let’s be honest, they play to our often-quiet darker selves.

3. They put the person, place, or thing that matters in the headline.

Not only does this tap into the cultural zeitgeist, but it taps into trending topics in search and social. It makes the piece sticky to parts of the web (and culture) that normally wouldn’t care about an article. It forces these persons, places, and things to take note. And it doesn’t hurt from an SEO perspective.

4. They don’t care how long they go.

“Oh, there’s a character limit best practice for writing headlines? Why don’t you tell me all about it in my comments section, in the article you’re currently reading, with the headline you followed to get here?”

5. They write like real people talk.

Meaning gets lost in the brandspeak filter. You don’t need to sound “official” for people to take you seriously. In fact, the more you dress up your language, the less you appeal to real people.

(Note: I get that some brands and audiences require a more high-minded approach, but a conversational tone, especially on the web, allows you to be more accessible regardless of your academic rigor and standing.)

6. They (usually) deliver.

The cardinal sin on the web (and the thing that gets users to spit vitriol at you with the intensity of one thousand suns) is to bait and switch with your headline.

If you are promising free beer, there better be free beer when those you promised it to arrive. Or else? Chaos, resentment, and abandonment.

You don’t have to “be like Gawker” to get an audience on the web. But it couldn’t hurt to pay attention to these tastemakers. They’ve got the market cornered on attention.

It doesn’t matter if you’re B2B or B2C, Gawker’s headlines speak to the human at the other end of the connection like an actual human, they intrigue, and they pull an emotional trigger in readers.

Oh yeah, and they get clicked. They’re not perfect, but they don’t have to be.

What site do you think writes the best headlines?

[Image: Kevan]

*I figured it probably made sense to list some of these hyped-up headlines, but just like when you make your friend listen to a song that you’ve been listening to a lot lately and watching them slowly not fall in love, these will undoubtedly disappoint:

  • Company That Owns Costa Concordia Offers Customers 30 Percent Off Their Next Non-Sinking Cruise
  • Tracy Morgan Collapses At Sundance Festival But Not Because Of Drugs, Alcohol Or Kevin Federline’s Fatness
  • Happy Monday: 1.5 Million Credit Cards Were Stolen By Hackers
  • Study: Conservatives in the 70s Were Way Less Skeptical of Science
  • Are You Spending Enough Money on Beauty Products for Your Ugly Baby?


Andrew Hanelly

Written by: Andrew Hanelly

Andrew is SVP, Strategy at McMurry/TMG and for one semester in college, was a sociology major. Follow him on Twitter and Google+.

  • http://twitter.com/prcheney Paul Cheney

    Uh, there’s a character limit best practice for writing headlines. It’s one less than the headline you wrote for this article. Sorry. Guess you weren’t “in the know.” Better luck next time…

    Great article though, despite the headline ;)

    • http://www.twitter.com/hanelly Andrew Hanelly

      Well played, sir. Well played.

  • http://www.yahoo.com/akiksnasis Allen

    Hmm, maybe if i mention Gawker in the headline and try to be snarky people will share my post …

    • http://www.twitter.com/hanelly Andrew Hanelly

      Exactly – did it work??

  • Moe Smith

    What’s Gawker? i’ve honestly no clue.

    • http://www.twitter.com/hanelly Andrew Hanelly

      My fault – I should have added a sentence explaining who they were. Gawker is sort of an irreverent culture blog. Check them out here http://gawker.com/ While not all brands can take a page out of their book, it’s at least reading their book, proverbially speaking.

  • Pingback: Best of B2B Marketing Zone for April 3, 2012 « Sales and Marketing Jobs

  • Charles Masterson

    “there’s a character limit best practice for writing headlines? ” Yes. Around 120 characters. Less is fine. Yours is 64.

    • http://www.twitter.com/hanelly Andrew Hanelly

      I’d agree that physically, you don’t want to go past 120 characters. I mean shoot, that’s barely Tweetable.

      That said, most of the best practices I see quoted are “around 70 characters” (because that’s the cutoff for what will appear in SERPs). I think there is plenty of room for more beyond 70, and it seems that we agree on that. 120 characters is probably a good max but is still well above conventional wisdom, I think so anyway.

  • Charles Masterson

    90% of advertising is worthless. But if we look at the 10% that is used month after month, the sales pages that last the longest are likely to be profitable. Not a sure thing, but lets say the shortest lived ones are not. Looking at those long-lived sales pages they average about 120 characters for a headline. The old timey copywriters say, copy what works.

  • http://www.thoughtplanners.com/ Sarha of Internet Advertising

    Gawker indeed has captured all the right strategies in creating the best headlines. It takes a lot of talent to be this good.

  • Pingback: Things I Learned from Analyzing My Last 1,000 Tweets — @TMGmedia

  • Pingback: Checklist: 5 Questions to Ask Before Pressing Publish — @TMGmedia

  • Pingback: Headsmacking Tip #21: Write Better Headlines Than Anyone Else | Buypappa blog

  • Pingback: Headsmacking Tip #21: Write Better Headlines Than Anyone Else | Clixto7

  • Pingback: How Social Media Can Improve User Experience | Grant Tilus

  • Pingback: Headsmacking Tip #21: Write Better Headlines Than Anyone Else » Any Problem? in Any News?

  • Pingback: » Headsmacking Tip #21: Write Better Headlines Than Anyone Else

  • Pingback: Headsmacking Tip #21: Write Better Headlines Than Anyone Else | CS5 Design

  • http://harounkola.com Haroun Kola

    Great article, those headlines do have a magnetic pull, and I wanted to click on many more than just one article on their homepage/

    • http://www.twitter.com/hanelly Andrew Hanelly

      That’s their secret, mesmerizing trick that gets people sucked in only to find themselves drooling and staring at their screen 6 days later wondering what happened to the week. Or something like that :)

  • Pingback: Headsmacking Tip #21: Write Better Headlines Than Anyone Else | Top Service Wizard

  • Pingback: Headsmacking Tip #21: Write Better Headlines Than Anyone Else

  • Pingback: Search Engine Optimization » Blog Archive » Headsmacking Tip #21: Write Better Headlines Than Anyone Else

  • http://www.sc3on3.com Adam J Moore

    The Onion Writes Amazing Headlines

  • Pingback: Headsmacking Tip #21: Write Better Headlines Than Anyone Else

  • Pingback: Headsmacking Tip #21: Write Better Headlines Than Anyone Else » farshidramezani.com

  • Pingback: Add Web Site | World News » Blog Archive » Headsmacking Tip #21: Write Better Headlines Than Anyone Else

  • Is there a law for names?

    Funny, I had just come to some of these conclusions a month or so ago. I write for a couple of sites that discourages long and clever headlines… I felt trapped – with boring headlines and my view count went on articles went down, I decided to ignore the comments and have been working to improve the headlines and increase the appeal to readers.

  • Pingback: Why people would rather read Web content than print content | Michelle Moriarity Witt

  • http://twitter.com/PTheWyse Praverb.net

    I need to check out The Onion…this is my first time here and I must admit I was pulled in haha.

  • Pingback: 9 Resources for Writing Great Blog Headlines – Cool Marketing Stuff

  • Pingback: 3 Google Analytics Tips for Content Creators — @TMGmedia

Previous post:

Next post: