Why Content Eats Advertising’s Lunch

by Andrew Hanelly on February 27, 2012

banana has advertising but content eats its lunch

There’s a decades old saying in advertising that bears repeating:

“People don’t read ads – they read what interests them. Sometimes it’s an ad.”

The man behind those words – Howard Gossage – was right. Sometimes it is an ad. Sometimes.

Every other time, it’s content. 

(Sure, we all fell in love with the Old Spice guy, and the Most Interesting Man in the World campaign has played on giddy repeat for years. We dig the Visa ads telling heroic stories of athletes overcoming great odds to succeed. Great ads do still exist and they do still work. But that’s because they’ve actually become content.)

For the purpose of this argument, I’m defining content as a bit of data that presents an idea beyond a direct product promotion. It serves a purpose beyond promoting a company. It useful and/or entertaining. It may be a story. It qualifies as a social object. Traditional advertising is less so.

Content is more effective than traditional advertising, because:

People seek out content. They tolerate ads.

Content is the “there, there” (h/t Mike and Kim) and advertising is the “it happens to be there.” Recent data quantifies the intuition: 61% of people prefer learning about companies via articles instead of ads.

Content is an incubator for prospective customers.

Content bridges the gap between “brand awareness” and “purchase” on the by being helpful, relevant and to people as they navigate the buying cycle. Brands that are missing this layer are making it harder for the chicken to hatch.

Content has long-lasting value.

An article posted to a website has an average lifespan of relevance that dwarfs the estimated 2 hour lifespan of the average Tweet. Good content can get organic search traffic and social pickup traffic for years. And an article posted in a magazine has great coffee-table and travel potential, and tremendous pass-along value. Not bad for a one-time investment.

Content nurtures business relationships.

People are more loyal to companies that have invested in content. They appreciate good information and entertainment, but what they really love is a great story – regardless of the format. Good content keeps people engaged and organizations top of mind.

Content isn’t king because kings are mortal. Content is Zeus.

It could be the best investment your brand makes in terms of strengthening relationships with customers and earning new ones.

And as the landscape shifts and ads continue to face challenges (in format and in message) we’ve got to answer some questions for our organizations:

Will we have a voice? Will we have a say? Will we have credibility in the social context when the time comes when we really need to be heard?

Or will we just hope that our customers are saying something nice behind our back?

Andrew Hanelly

Written by: Andrew Hanelly

Andrew is SVP, Strategy at McMurry/TMG and for one semester in college, was a sociology major. Follow him on Twitter and Google+.

  • Eatit Azule

    You cannot deny that advertising works and has a profound impact on culture.

    • http://www.twitter.com/hanelly Andrew Hanelly

      You’re right. There’s no denying that advertising has helped shape our culture (for better or worse) and it has influenced many people to spend many dollars. I was just saying that content might be a better long-term investment for brands. Both advertising and content require strategic thinking and creative vision, and both can have demonstrative ROI.

      • http://twitter.com/prcheney Paul Cheney

        All ads ARE content. Some ads have better content than others. Some ads are so good, they are only recognizable as content. Some are so bad, they are only recognizable as ads. Most are somewhere in the bad to middling range.

        You might be able to make the case that the inverse is true: all content is ads. But I’d need more than a blog comment for that one.

        • http://www.twitter.com/hanelly Andrew Hanelly

          You know, Paul, I think you make an excellent point. What it really comes down to is how much value are you giving people in your message? Did you make them laugh? Did you make them smarter? Did you make them feel? Did you make them take action? If you did any of the above, you’re on the right track. If you made their eyes roll (or glaze over) you’re doing something wrong: whether its an ad or a piece of “content.”

          Thanks for dropping by with the comment!

  • Pingback: Best of B2B Marketing Zone for February 27, 2012 « Sales and Marketing Jobs

  • https://tmgcustommedia.com Allison King

    Andrew – these are all great points about the value of content marketing! I totally agree with the point that people don’t seek out ads – they seek out content. There’s a reason why there is an explosion in content marketing. The Internet and all the sharing tools have given people the ability to get information like never before. Companies that want to engage customers and build brand loyalty can’t just use advertisements anymore. Consumers/customers demand more these days because we CAN. Sure, I still love a great commercial — but the ones I love seem to tell a great story (like those e-Trade commercials that crack me up).

  • Pingback: 9 Ways to Measure Your Content’s Success | CopyPress

  • Pingback: Content Dilution (and How to Avoid It) | Social Media Explorer

  • Pingback: The Content Dilution Problem — @TMGmedia

  • Pingback: Brands to Watch, Why Content + More « The Outbrain Blog

  • Pingback: What Jodie Foster at the Golden Globes Taught Me About Content Marketing — @TMGmedia

  • Pingback: A List of Reasons to Embrace Content in Your Marketing Mix, Illustrated in Charts — @TMGmedia

  • Pingback: The Venn Diagram of Strategic Branded Content — @TMGmedia

Previous post:

Next post: