SEO Killed the Analog Star

by Michael McCarthy on May 19, 2011

seo killed the analog star robot

Someone spouted this thought in the billion-voice echo chamber that is Twitter the other day: “Too many people are writing content for Google and not their readers.”

The dude nailed it.

Of course, five minutes later he Tweeted: “5 affordable ways to see Paris like a local”…which, of course, is something that’s been covered more times than Angelina Jolie’s baby-mama and symbolic-tattoo crusade.

If you’re a writer who cares about readers, you can’t help but notice that your copy has been impacted by what I call the Great Extortionist known as SEO. 

The Great Extortionist—yes, picture Joe Pesci in “Goodfellas”—aided by a new breed of media professionals with titles and gigs that didn’t even exist five years ago, tells us we must produce content the Google spiders like…or we will be mercilessly maimed online—and no one will like you in the church of right now.

Invariably, these threats beget bite-size content chunks. Which beget bite-size headlines. Which beget, allegedly, more eyeballs to your website.

I get it. And I’m getting used to it, grudgingly.

(The Great Extortionist has even impacted my thinking at home. I say all manner of ridiculous things to my kids: “Quick, name the top 3 things you did at lunch today.” At which point the three of them deadpan, “We ate our baloney sandwiches.”)

While SEO has even impacted the way I plan stories—fewer narratives, chunkier pieces—I maintain that, no matter what the medium, great content will take you to the Promised Land with readers.

But what constitutes great content these days, and can the Great Extortionist be used to your advantage? Get a little creative:

Get Naked. Strip away the SEO scaffolding that often props up your stories—the incessant lists, the quote-free paragraphs, the bland headlines—and assign and write pieces that were created to spark discovery or additional learning.

Get Naked Consistently. Great content isn’t about one-hit wonders and the single killer story that delivered 20,000 unique visitors to your website in one day but never returned. It’s about consistency, readership trust and literary brand building. SEO can’t do that. Nor can spider-food headlines.

OK, put your clothes back on.

The Great Extortionist isn’t going away. He’s on every corner of the web, and he has many frightening cousins and, soon, potentially frightening baby cousins.

But the man can be tamed and used to your advantage. Do not strip away your editorial integrity, but instead merge it with the new normal, and that normal is SEO.

To be sure, you’ll need to be creative.

Here’s what our Twitter friend could have written: “How I fell in love with Paris cafes, midnight rooftops and a poet on the same night and didn’t break the bank.”

Yeah, I’d read that.

Remember, great content lives forever. And the rest? It’s gone, baby, gone, stomped out like a spent Camel beneath Joe Pesci’s disagreeable little boot heel.

[image: davedehetre]

Michael McCarthy

Written by: Michael McCarthy

Michael, who is the editor in chief and content director of Washington Flyer, hopes to be the man his dog thinks he is.

  • http://technicallyeasy.net Paul Salmon

    I had to chuckle at your Twitter story in the beginning. It seems many people online don’t practice what they preach – especially when it comes to making money online and SEO.

    Anyway, writing for readers is important, mainly because search engines don’t visit your blog (unless to list your content), so having a headline that doesn’t attract actual human visitors is useless. Even if your post appears on the front page of Google, if it doesn’t attract people, no one is going to click the link.

    I have skipped many top search results because the title didn’t describe what I was looking for. Having your title indicate value/solution to a person performing the search is important.

  • Melanie Powers

    Beautifully written and great points, Michael. I’ve been thinking about this a lot lately, how to continue to strive for amazing stories, “yes, please, I want more” leads and killer quotes, but still strive for strong SEO. I’ve started to read stories a little differently as I edit. Without going overboard, I make sure the point is coming across early on, using keywords and phrases when appropriate. For example, I’ve received some articles to edit on a particular health topic that don’t mention the exact name of the health disorder until halfway through the story. I suppose the writers assume their loyal audience knows what they’re talking about. But what about new readers and those finding the story through a Google search? A little tweak here and there tells your readers, as well as spiderbots, what you’re focusing on.

  • http://engage.tmgcustommedia.com Ricky Ribeiro

    Excellent post, Michael! Like you said, the best thing to do is to integrate SEO optimization techniques into your content creation process.

  • http://washingtonflyer.com Michael McCarthy

    Paul: Thanks! I agree. People don’t always practice what they preach…

    Melanie: Marrying SEO and great content isn’t easy, is it? Thanks so much for your feedback!

  • Tom

    Worth the read for the headline alone. And I’m not fooled, I see “SEO” as a keyword in there :P

  • http://washingtonflyer.com Michael McCarthy

    Ricky, thanks, man!

    Tom: Ha. I’ve been nabbed! You’re right…

  • Bill Sweeney

    Of course, content rules. Technology is only a delivery mechanism, to be understood, so that content can be delivered effectively.

    Content is number 1, followed closely by number 2 — a catchy headline. One only needs to look at the tabloid newspapers like the NY and the UK tabloids to see what gets looked at in the analog world. SEOs are just today’s version of the proverbial man in the street. it used to be people in hurry, looking for interesting news, delivered in digestible chunks. Now it’s SEOs.

    A lot of websites might need to learn from the tabloids. The formula that worked pretty well in print might just be the one that works pretty well with SEOs.

    What’s the trick? Clever headlines, short sentences, and an understanding that its about the reader, not the writer. Good, reader-focused writing always beats bad, writer-focused writing. If we want people to read what we write, we’ll have to write it in a way they’ll want to read it. That means understanding SEO’s are like great headlines — they get you noticed. Great content, though, holds the reader’s attention.

    • http://twitter.com/PTheWyse Praverb.net

      Great response Bill!

      I like the fact that you stated that a lot of websites need to learn from the tabloids.

      Thank you for your insight

  • Pingback: 22 Questions Google Asks Before Sealing Your Site’s Fate – Engage

  • Pingback: How Google Thinks About Content – Engage

  • Pingback: How Google Reads Your Blog – Engage

  • Pingback: Why Literature Matters (Despite What Those Last 50 Million Tweets Told You) — @TMGmedia

  • Pingback: Find Your Recall Attorney » Why Literature Matters (Despite What Those Last 50 Million Tweets Told You)

  • Pingback: So, You Want to be a Web Editor? Know These 11 Things — @TMGmedia

  • Pingback: Why Gawker is Writing Better Headlines Than the Rest of the Web — @TMGmedia

  • Pingback: Google Wants to Know Who Wrote Your Post: Here’s Why (and How) You Should Tell Them — @TMGmedia

Previous post:

Next post: